THE CARBON FOOTPRINT OF A MEAT PROCESSING COMPANY

  • Jerzy Bieńkowski Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment – Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Radosław Dąbrowicz Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment – Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Ewa Dworecka-Wąż Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment – Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Małgorzata Holka Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment – Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Janusz Jankowiak Institute for Agricultural and Forest Environment – Polish Academy of Sciences
Keywords: carbon footprint, GHG emissions, climate change, food industry, transport, emission intensity indicators

Abstract

Plans for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the agri-food sector should not only include the production of agricultural raw materials but also the food processing industry. The aim of the research was to determine the carbon footprint of a meat processing enterprise and to analyze the intensity indicators of GHG emissions. The study was conducted in a medium-sized company, located in the Wielkopolska Province, for which pork is a basic feedstock for the production (over 81.0%). The results show that the largest GHG emissions were related to the consumption of electricity, natural gas and fuels in the transport of products. There were estimated values of several indicators of emission intensity. The main indicator of GHG emissions related to the unit of product was 519 g CO2 eq. per 1 kg. It is concluded that the analysis of the carbon footprint can be an important instrument for the management of GHG emissions at the company level and can also serve the purpose of assessing the effects of implementing plans for a low-carbon economy in the meat processing sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2017-06-30
How to Cite
Bieńkowski, J., Dąbrowicz, R., Dworecka-Wąż, E., Holka, M., & Jankowiak, J. (2017). THE CARBON FOOTPRINT OF A MEAT PROCESSING COMPANY. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 16(2), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.22630/ASPE.2017.16.2.13