NATIONAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT POLICY IN A HIGHLY MOBILE SOCIETY: FORMATION METHODOLOGY AND IMPLEMENTATION CONCEPT
Abstract
The article aims to substantiate the relevance of the formation and implementation of national human development policy in a highly mobile society, in light of the modern imperative for a person’s right to freedom of movement and freedom of choice. Such a policy envisages a set of measures aimed at creating a favourable internal living environment and, at the same time, preserving the possibility for the right of return and protection of citizens, regardless of their place of residence. The study deepens the theoretical foundations of national human development policy under the conditions of a highly mobile society. The article justifies the dominance of neoliberal ideology in managerial approaches to policy implementation, and the necessity of legislative consolidation of national human development policy in a highly mobile society. The concept includes three categories and related goals: general security provisions and principles of movement regulations applied to all categories of mobile persons; internal spatial mobility; external (inbound, outbound) spatial mobility. The concept is an important component in the implementation of national sectoral doctrines (socio- -cultural, political and legal, economic, security), which in the long term will ensure the formation of a human development paradigm under conditions of a highly mobile society for sustainable human development. The harmonization of national human development policy with national migration policy proves the advantages of selective multiculturalism in providing spiritual and information mobility for a person and a state.
Downloads
References
Abbasi-Shavazi, M.J., Sadeghi, R., Mohammadi, A. (2017). Migrants’ Integration in Host Societies, and Return to Home Countries: The Case of the Middle East and South Asia. Migration Research Leaders’ Syndicate. International Organization for Migration, 151–158.
Balcerzak, A.P., Pietrzak, M.B. (2017). Human development and quality of institutions in highly developed countries. [In:] Financial Environment and Business Development. Proceedings of the 16th Eurasia Business and Economics Society. Vol. 1, 231–241.
Bil, M. (2017). Population spatial mobility: essence and characteristics. Annals of Marketing Management & Economics, 3 (2), 5–16.
Churilova, E.Y., Salin, V.N., Shpakovskaia, E.P., Sitnikova, O.Y. (2019). Influence of world social and economic
indicators’ interlinkage on the development of human potential. Journal of International Studies, 12 (4), 79–99.
Escosura, L.P. (2019). Human Development in the Age of Globalisation. Instituto Figuerola, Universidad Carlos III Working Papers 19-04. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34872.39686
Ghislandi, S., Sanderson, W.C., Scherbov, S. (2019). A Simple Measure of Human Development: The Human Life Indicator. Population and Development Review, 45 (1), 219–233.
Grimm, M., Harttgen, K., Klasen, S., Misselhorn, M., Munzi, T., Smeeding, T. (2010). Inequality in Human Development: An Empirical Assessment of 32 Countries. Social Indicators Research, 97, 191–211.
Jahan, S. (2019). Human Development and Universalism: From Ideas to Policies. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20 (2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1574726
Jiang, J., Chen, J., Tu, W., Wang, C. (2019). A novel effective indicator of weighted inter-city human mobility networks to estimate economic development Sustainability, 11 (22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226348
Kolodiy, A.F. (2011). Doktryna multykulturalizmu: perspektyvy modyfikatsii u novykh derzhavakh iz nekonsolidovanymy natsiiamy [The doctrine of multiculturalism: prospects for modification in new states with unconsolidated nations]. Demokratychne vriaduvannia, 8. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/DeVr_2011_8_4 [accessed 14.02.2020].
Kuts, H.M. (2010). Neoliberalizm: osnovni idei ta interpretatsii [Neoliberalism: basic ideas and interpretations]. Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. V.N. Karazina, 912 (17), 174–183. Migration data portal. The bigger picture (n.d.). Retrieved from https://migrationdataportal.org [accessed 12.02.2020].
Mustafa, G., Rizov M., Kernohan, D. (2017). Growth, human development, and trade: The Asian experience. Economic Modelling, 61, 93–101.
Pradhan, J.P., Vinoj, A. (2002). Does Human Development Policy Matter for Economic Growth? Evidence from Indian States. South Asia Economic Journal, 3 (1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/139156140200300105
Renouard, C., Ezvan, C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility towards human development: A capabilities framework. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27 (2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12181
Stepura, Т. (2020). Differentiation of human potential quality in regions of Ukraine: demographic and health aspects. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Oeconomia, 19 (1), 49–59.
Tiuriukanova, E., Zh. Zaionchkovska (Eds.) (2007). Sovremennyy myhratsyonnyy rezhym i eho osobennosty v Rossyy. Metodolohyia i metody izucheniya myhratsyonnykh protsessov [Methodology and methods for migration processes studying]. Moskva.
United Nations Development Programme (2016). Human Development Report 2016. Human Development for everyone. UNDP, New York. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf [accessed 12.02.2020].
United Nations Development Programme portal (n.d.). Human Development Data (1990–2018). Human Development Reports. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/data#http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf [accessed 12.02.2020].
Van Vuuren, D.P., Riahi, K, Calvin, K., Dellink, R. (2017). The Shared Socio-economic Pathways: Trajectories for human development and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 148–152.
Vovkanych, S.Y., Ryndzak, O.T. (2013). Dukhovno-informatsiina mobilnist yak systema formuvannia transfernykh struktur buttia liudyny i natsii [Spiritual-information mobility as a system of transfer structures formation of being of human and nation]. Donetskyi visnyk Naukovoho tovarystva imeni Shevchenka. Donetske viddilennia Naukovoho tovarystva imeni Shevchenka, 38, 34–46.
